Fight for the Future

150+ prominent artists, actors, and musicians come out in support of tomorrow’s net neutrality protests, call on Congress to stop the FCC

Posted 23:01 EST on December 5, 2017

Contact: Evan Greer, 978-852-6457,

Tom Morello, Incubus, Evangeline Lilly, Bassnectar, Against Me!, Alyssa Milano, Michael Stipe (REM), Wil Wheaton, Talib Kweli, Gramatik, Graham Nash, The Glitch Mob, Downtown Boys, Speedy Ortiz, Anti-Flag among signers

More than 150 prominent artists, musicians, and actors have signed a letter endorsing the hundreds of protests planned for tomorrow at Verizon stores and Congressional offices nationwide. The artists echoed the protests call for Congress to take action to stop the FCC’s planned vote to kill net neutrality protections on December 14.

REM singer Michael Stipe, Star Trek actor Wil Wheaton, Rage Against the Machine guitarist Tom Morello, EDM legend Bassnectar, actress Evangeline Lilly (Lost, The Hobbit, Ant Man), rock band Incubus, punk stars Against Me!, hip hop icon Talib Kweli, Dresden Dolls songwriter Amanda Palmer, EDM favorites The Glitch Mob, classic rock hero Graham Nash (Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young), Colin Hay (Men At Work), actress Alyssa Milano, and Ian Alexander (Netflix series The OA), are among the signers, along with Downtown Boys, Speedy Ortiz, STS9, Anti-Flag, Atmosphere, Priests, Trackstar the DJ (Run the Jewels), Kimya Dawson, author Cory Doctorow, Algiers, and dozens of others.

“If the FCC votes to gut these protections it will explicitly allow Internet providers to charge extra fees that amount to a tax on the entire creative economy,” the letter reads. “A few corporations will have control over what you see and hear, while independent and up-and-coming artists’ ability to make a living will be devastated. Without net neutrality there will be less awesome art. Period.”

The letter goes on: “We support the people from across the political spectrum protesting across the country on December 7, and we echo their call for our members of Congress to do their jobs and take action to stop the FCC vote that’s planned for December 14.”

“A free and open Internet, adhering to the foundational principles of Network Neutrality, has allowed business to flourish, revitalized industries, and given voice to marginalized people not only in America, but around the world. There is no reason to change this standard now, except for corporate greed,” said actor Wil Wheaton (Star Trek, Big Bang Theory), “Allowing ISPs to engage in pay-for-play traffic prioritization will stifle innovation, silence voices, and lead to censorship online. I call on all Americans to support Network Neutrality.”

“Net neutrality is what keeps the Internet weird and awesome,” said Evan Greer, campaign director of Fight for the Future, who is also a touring musician, “Without it, a few giant corporations will have unprecedented control over the culture we create and consume, and independent and alternative artists will be silenced. That’s why we’re fighting back.”

See the letter and a full list of signers here.

Prominent artists that would like to add their names to the letter are encouraged to email


Share on:

Open letter from artists: we support net neutrality protests and call on Congress to #StopTheFCC

Posted 17:08 EST on December 5, 2017

December, 2017

To: U.S. Congress:

The medium that allows us to be great artists is under threat. Without a free and open internet, so much music, writing, film, art, culture, passion, and creativity would be lost.

For the artists of the future, and the culture of the future, we will not be silent.

Title II guarantees net neutrality and prevents powerful telecom giants like AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon from deciding what art, as well as what news, is easily accessible online.

If the FCC votes to gut these protections it will explicitly allow Internet providers to charge extra fees that amount to a tax on the entire creative economy. A few corporations will have control over what you see and hear, while independent and up-and-coming artists’ ability to make a living will be devastated.

Without net neutrality there will be less awesome art. Period.

The open Internet lets artists reach each other and audiences across the world in unprecedented ways. We are able to collaborate, learn, improve our worlds, participate in our society, and bring the things we love to people who are moved by them.

Freedom of speech and freedom of expression are guaranteed by our constitution, and we demand that such freedoms continue online. Net Neutrality is essential to our democracy.

We support the people from across the political spectrum protesting across the country on December 7, and we echo their call for our members of Congress to do their jobs and take action to stop the FCC vote that’s planned for December 14.

By fighting for net neutrality, you fight for the future of art.


Adam Venable / Obeah
Adel Alizadeh
Against Me!
Alfre Woodard
Alyssa Milano
Amanda Levie
Amanda michelle
Amanda Palmer
Andrew Lee
Andrew Woolford
Andy Farnsworth
Arvin Clay
Ashlee Voorsanger
Brandon Schell
Brett Eidman
Brian Baron
Bronwyn Isaac
Bug Martin
Camille Theobald
Candiss Veree
Carla Anderson 
Charlie Hunter
Chloe Herry
Chris Leed
Colin Hay
Cory Doctorow, author
Craig Mahoney
Darby Thomas
Darla Jean Patterson
Debra Castellano
Dina Losito
Doug Appling pka Emancipator
Downtown Boys
Elise-Ann Konstantin
Eva Mozena Brandon
Evangeline Lilly
George Sluppick
Graham Nash
Greg Radin
Gregory Joseph
Heather Maloney
Howard Lester
Ian Alexander
Iris Creamer
James Finn
Jaye McBride
Jeff Hysen
Jeffrey Joseph
Jen Lap
Jessica Brodkin
Jim Mendrinos
Joe Velez
Joey Novick
Jon Yeager
Josh Clauson
Joshua T. Bell
Jude Treder-Wolff
Kevin Barnett
Kevin D. Williams
Kimya Dawson
Kyle Holly
Leah Bonnema
Lesa Noelle
Lili Roquelin
Lisa Curry
Liz Barrett
Liz Larkin
Liz Miele
Lori Nemec
Lucie Steiner
Lynn Bixenspan
Margaret Dodge
Maria Minerva
Marie Corfield
Mark Anthony Ramirez
Matthew Ismael Ruiz
May Wilkerson
Melissa Rocha
Michael Austin Smalley
Michael Carsillo
Michael Stipe, artist/musician
Michi Muzyka
Mike Sasson
Missy G
Mo Vida
Nat Towsen
Nicholas Allred
Nick Cara
Nikki Clark
Pauline Murphy
Peter Michael Marino
Rachel Green
Ralph Attanasia
Richard Chartier
Rocco Romeo
Roderick Spencer
Sachi Ezura
Sarah Doneghy
Scott Blakeman
Seena Ghaznavi
Speedy Ortiz
Stephen Saffel
Summer Dawn Reyes
Suzanne Lawrence
Suzy Exposito
Talib Kweli
Terry Klein
Tessa Rochon
The Blow
The Glitch Mob
Thomas Cappel
Tiffy DiGiacomo
TJ Del Reno
Tom Morello
TRACEY Carnazzo
Trackstar the DJ
Trophy Wife
Tyler rothrock
wendy liebman
Whitness/Chill Mickelson
Wil Wheaton
Yarineth Pena
Zain Zaidi

Share on:

Former Verizon lawyer turned FCC chairman Ajit Pai is speaking tomorrow at Verizon headquarters

Posted 22:25 EST on December 4, 2017

Verizon-lawyer-turned-FCC-Chairman Ajit Pai is speaking at Verizon Headquarters in Washington, DC tomorrow – just days before a planned vote to gut net neutrality protections that Verizon has lobbied to kill.

The following quote can be attributed to Evan Greer, campaign director of Fight for the Future (pronouns: she/her):

“This is the kind of corruption that turns your stomach. This is why people are protesting at hundreds of Verizon stores and Congressional offices across the country on Thursday, and why more than 750,000 people have called Congress through Ajit Pai is an embarassment to his own party and under his leadership the FCC has made a mockery of our democratic process. With a rogue FCC commissioner blatantly captured by the industry he is supposed to provide oversight for, Congress must do their job and take action to stop the FCC vote on December 14.”

Contact: 978-852-6457,


Share on:

The FCC sabotaged its own public comments process. Congress needs to stop them from voting to kill net neutrality on December 14

Posted 11:03 EST on November 30, 2017

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 30, 2017
Contact: Evan Greer,, 978-852-6457

Yesterday’s Pew Research study led to incorrect reports

Yesterday, the Pew Research Group released a study that triggered a number of new reports about issues within the FCC’s net neutrality comment docket. The Pew study, unfortunately, contained a number of serious inaccuracies, and lacked needed context in a way that conflated legitimate grassroots advocacy and organic online outrage with malicious attempts to manipulate the FCC docket with fraud.

“The FCC sabotaged its own public comment process for the exact purpose of sowing the type of confusion that we’re seeing now,” said Evan Greer, campaign director of Fight for the Future, “They knowingly allowed malicious actors to abuse their system and submit enormous numbers of fraudulent comments using real people’s names and addresses without their permission, and they’ve refused to cooperate with investigations or transparency laws.”

She continued, “Their goal is to obscure the fact that the overwhelming majority of people from across the political spectrum oppose Ajit Pai’s extreme proposal to gut net neutrality protections. All you have to do is look at the unique comments in the docket that people took the time to draft by hand: almost 99% of them support existing net neutrality protections. Congress must take action now to demand the FCC cancel its planned vote on December 14. It’s unconscionable that the agency would move forward with such a controversial proposal while so many allegations of serious fraud and abuse surround their rulemaking proceeding.”

Here are some key things that the Pew study got wrong:

  • The original Pew study claimed that there had only been 450,000 comments during the FCC debate in 2014. There were closer to 4 million. Pew has since corrected this error after we brought it to their attention, but they have not addressed the points below.  

  • The Pew study claims that comedian John Oliver promoted our net neutrality advocacy site – to our knowledge that is incorrect. During his viral net neutrality segment, John Oliver directed viewers to his own page:

  • The study casts suspicion on legitimate comments using the text from, noting that 476,000+ were submitted at the same time on July 19. That’s because these comments were submitted as a CSV using the FCC’s “bulk upload” option, a perfectly legitimate way to submit comments to the agency, and in fact the one that the agency encouraged groups to use. Pew never asked us about this, or we would have been happy to provide them with the records of this. 

  • The study claims that the large bulk of comments came from “a small number of organizations,” and points to as an example. However, this is a mischaracterization of what the site is. It’s an Internet-wide coalition effort that has been promoted by dozens of public interest organizations, hundreds of startups, and thousands of websites, apps, and online communities who participated in the July 12 day of action and other campaigns. 

  • Overall, the study fails to give readers needed context to understand the difference between a legitimate comment submitted through a site that provides a concerned constituent to add their name to a default statement, and comments that were submitted using real people’s names and addresses, likely stolen from breached databases, without those people’s permission or knowledge. The study seemed to be unaware of the various ongoing investigations surrounding this issue – including a law enforcement investigation by the New York Attorney General’s office. By failing to include essential information about the comments they analyzed, the Pew study offers a distorted view of what’s happening in the net neutrality docket.


Share on:

Fight for the Future statement on Ajit Pai’s ridiculous speech

Posted 09:39 EST on November 29, 2017

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 29, 2017
Contact: Evan Greer, 978-852-6457,

Yesterday, FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai gave a speech lashing out at net neutrality supporters from web companies to celebrities. The speech comes amid the backdrop of massive and growing public backlash to Pai’s proposal to gut Title II net neutrality protections, with more than half a million phone calls to Congress through in the last week, and hundreds of protests planned across the country on December 7. Many have noted outrage coming from conservatives, libertarians, and members of Pai’s own party. 

Fight for the Future campaign director Evan Greer (pronouns she/her) issued the following statement in response to Pai’s comments:

“Ajit Pai’s lies are becoming more and more desperate. He’s trolling celebrities because he knows he has no substantive argument to quell the growing backlash to his extreme proposal.

Pai’s comments about web companies like Twitter make absolutely no sense. Killing net neutrality will further concentrate power on the Internet into the hands of the few largest companies that can afford to pay. Anyone concerned with large web platforms limiting free speech should support net neutrality protections, which allow startups and small businesses to compete with the big guys, and ensure that Internet users have choices.

Ajit Pai’s plan won’t stop companies like Twitter and Facebook from engaging in censorship. Instead, it will explicitly allow companies like Verizon and Comcast to engage in censorship, and it will let large platforms like Facebook or Google pay them to squash small competitors. Pai’s distortion of the facts here can only be described as Orwellian. He’s citing free speech as his reason for gutting free speech protections.

Still, we have to admit Pai is smart: when old allies in telecom oblige you to introduce a plan the entire country hates, mocking celebrities and saying a bunch of random BS is probably the best option.”

Fight for the Future is a digital rights group known for their role in organizing the largest online protests in history including the SOPA Blackout, the Internet Slowdown, and the July 12 Internet-Wide Day of Action for Net Neutrality.


Share on: